Discussion

Part 1

WE WRITE ESSAYS FOR STUDENTS

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.

Write My Essay For Me

Your analysis should be at least 500 words. You will want to consider the following elements.

Main argument: What is the author’s central purpose, and primary arguments or central themes? This is the main idea, the main point the author it trying to convey. *Though you are focusing on a few sections you should talk about the article or chapter as a whole here.

Organization: How does the author break up their argument into sections? What are these sections and what does each discuss? Why does the author organize their argument in this way? What purpose does this organizational structure serve? *Since you are focusing on select section(s) of the article you should describe the structure of these sections, how are they broken up within each section. What does the author talk about first, second, third… and why?

Evidence: What types of evidence does the author use (other authors, historical or archival sources, interviews, surveys, participant observation, etc; also see HERE
(Links to an external site.)
)? Which specific authors does this author cite and why? How does this evidence support the author’s argument? Do not just list the authors cited, but rather, explain why a few key authors are central and important to this author’s main arguments. If the author uses ethnographic research involving participant observation, or if they use interviewing or surveys, how does this data or evidence support and back-up their argument?

Part 2

In 500 words or more, please respond to the following questions.

1) What are Bonilla-Silva’s four kinds of color-blind racism? Please give an example of how you think each may provide people with an opportunity or excuse to ignore “pressing, systemic processes of inequality”, as noted by the Atlantic article.

Part 3
In the same word document, continue your analysis by developing at least two or three questions you have about the source. For example, you may consider what about the source makes you curious/doubtful/confused, or consider what additional information you would like to know to deepen your understanding.

In your responses, please be sure to include consideration of the intersectional positionality (the different identities) of the author of the primary source, to the best of your ability. That is, how do you thinks the author was influenced by their ideological, political and socioeconomic contexts/networks, and what kind of audience and impact/relevance might this primary source have had historically.

This means that you will likely need to conduct research on the author of the source.

Your responses must be written in full sentences, and have at least 500 words.