After covering the first part of the project and obtaining feedback from your peers, you are tasked to complete the last part of the proposal. You are now responsible for the following areas:
WE WRITE ESSAYS FOR STUDENTS
Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.
Write My Essay For Me
Proposed program/system/process that could address the issue. Look for third party solutions if possible.
If a company can provide you with the solution to the problem, make sure to mention why you think that’s the case.
Make sure to also list the company’s track record. Have they had experience working on something like this before?
Vendors don’t like to get requests that don’t lead anywhere. Try, if possible to obtain the information from their website.
Potential risks involved in the execution of such project.
Think of possible scenarios that could affect the implementation of your project, i.e. budget constraints, lack of time, pushback from the stakeholders.
Some risks are unavoidable but could be mitigated. Try and find possible alternatives if such events were to happen.
Conclusion.
Think of this section as your closing argument, as to why this proposal would be the best option for the company to take.
Focus on items like improved daily workflow, possible long term financial savings, etc.
Proposals typically get sent to a financial office/owner, who for the most part will just understand the monetary gain from the project, thus, try and keep it as simple as possible.
There won’t be any peer review for this part of the assignment, but part of your grade will be based on your completion of the peer review from Part 1 of the project.
Format
The second part of the project must be 2 to 3 pages long.
MLA format.
Font:
Size 12
Either Calibri or Arial
1.5 line paragraph spacing.
Spellchecked
Rubric
Individual Project Part 2
Individual Project Part 2
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Proposed program/system/process that could address the issue
25.0 to >18.75 pts
Proficient
The content provides a good or excellent research on what the final program/system/process will be.
18.75 to >10.0 pts
Competent
The content is mostly complete but includes some minor inaccuracies and inconsistent arguments
10.0 to >0 pts
Incomplete
The content is mostly or entirely off- topic, or the answer has numerous factual inaccuracies, or the content is missing or is largely incomplete.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Potential risks involved in the execution of such project.
25.0 to >18.75 pts
Proficient
The content provides full knowledge on any possible risk involved with the proposal as well as alternative solutions to mitigate such threats.
18.75 to >12.5 pts
Competent
The content is mostly complete but includes some minor inaccuracies and inconsistent arguments
12.5 to >0 pts
Incomplete
The content is mostly or entirely off- topic, or the answer has numerous factual inaccuracies, or the content is missing or is largely incomplete.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Conclusion.
25.0 to >18.75 pts
Proficient
The content provides a good or excellent final statement with regards to the implementation of such proposal.
18.75 to >12.5 pts
Competent
The content is mostly complete but includes some minor inaccuracies and inconsistent arguments
12.5 to >0 pts
Incomplete
The content is mostly or entirely off- topic, or the answer has numerous factual inaccuracies, or the content is missing or is largely incomplete.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Quality of Language and Grammar
10.0 to >7.5 pts
Full Marks
The content contains no apparent grammatical or spelling errors. Language is appropriate for academic writing.
7.5 to >5.0 pts
Incomplete/Inadequate
The content is below the page minimum and/or contains several grammatical and/or spelling errors and demonstrates little evidence of proofreading or language is inappropriate for classroom discussion
5.0 to >0 pts
Competent
The content contains some minor grammatical and/or spelling errors. Language is mostly appropriate for academic writing, but room for improvement exists.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Peer Evaluation from Part 1
15.0 to >11.25 pts
Proficient
The content provides a good or excellent Insight as well as recommendations with regards to your peer’s proposal.
11.25 to >7.5 pts
Competent
The content is mostly complete but includes some minor inaccuracies and inconsistent arguments
7.5 to >0 pts
Incomplete
The content is mostly or entirely off- topic, or the answer has numerous factual inaccuracies, or the content is missing or is largely incomplete.
15.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0
For more information on Business Plan read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_plan
The post Business Plan appeared first on Australia Assessments.
The post Business Plan appeared first on Australia Assessments.